The Evolving Landscape of Remote Work and Workplace Legalities
The evolving landscape of remote work has brought new dimensions to workplace legalities, as evidenced by a recent case involving a former KPMG manager working remotely from Georgia. This case, which involves allegations of racial discrimination and wrongful termination, underscores the complex interplay of state laws in an era where work is no longer confined to traditional office settings.
In a notable decision, a federal district court ruled that the former business development and consulting manager, who worked from Georgia, could proceed with her lawsuit against KPMG under New York state and local laws. The manager, an African-American woman, was hired by KPMG during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic to work in New York City. However, due to remote working policies put in place by the company, she was initially required to work from her residence in Georgia before eventually moving to the New York City area.
The crux of her lawsuit centers around claims that KPMG allegedly denied her business opportunities because they purportedly did not want “an African American face” on certain projects. Despite raising concerns multiple times, including reaching out to KPMG’s ethics office, she was dismissed from her position shortly afterward.
Court’s Stance
The district court’s decision to allow the lawsuit to proceed highlights the expansive reach of New York’s Human Rights Laws. These laws have been interpreted to protect not just residents, but nonresidents who pursue state or city-based employment opportunities. The court noted that the former manager was poised to begin in-person work at the New York City office, a plan altered due to KPMG’s COVID-19 remote work policy.
The manager’s allegations claim that KPMG’s actions had a significant impact in New York, thus giving her a foundation to pursue claims under the state and city’s human rights legislation. This ruling reminds employers that even remote working conditions are subject to the jurisdiction of local laws where the business operations are centered.
Implications for Employers
With remote work reshaping traditional employment structures, businesses must be vigilant about compliance with varying state and local laws. These regulations often extend beyond discrimination, encompassing leave entitlements, wage requirements, expense reimbursement, taxation, and employment-related notices.
Additionally, federal protections remain intact. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has played a pivotal role during the pandemic, particularly regarding teleworking accommodations, and continues to do so. The former KPMG manager has also raised a federal race discrimination and retaliation claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, although this was not addressed in the current ruling.
Broader Context
This case arises amidst ongoing discussions about diversity and inclusion in corporate environments. According to court documents, the manager was assigned a project in St. Louis, Missouri, soon after her appointment at KPMG. She expressed concerns over traveling to a region experiencing civil unrest following George Floyd’s murder but was still introduced to the project team.
Further, she claimed disparity in opportunity allocation, asserting that similarly positioned managers who were not African-American received better business development support. Following an internal investigation, KPMG reportedly found no substantiation for her claims and terminated her employment, citing her refusal to accept projects.
Despite teleworking from Georgia, the manager’s connection to New York was evident. She was given a New York phone number, reported twice to the New York office, had her taxes deducted for New York state, and received unemployment benefits from there after her termination.
Takeaway for Remote Workers
The case of the former KPMG manager is a reminder of the legal nuances of remote work. As companies continue to embrace flexible working arrangements, understanding the jurisdiction of state and local laws becomes crucial—not just for employers, but for employees as well. It also emphasizes the importance of maintaining equitable practices in all aspects of employment.
For more insights on HR policies and legal updates in the modern workplace, subscribe to hrtechtrend.com.
Note: This article is inspired by content from hrdive.com. It has been rephrased for originality. Images are credited to the original source.





