Resource Wars and Hobbesian Enmity in Apocalyptic Fiction

resource wars - Resource Wars and Hobbesian Enmity in Apocalyptic Fiction
astronaut standing in abandoned planet with volcanic landscape,illustration painting

Introduction: The Rise of Resource Wars in Apocalyptic Fiction

In recent years, resource wars have become a central theme in apocalyptic fiction, reflecting real-world anxieties about environmental crises, economic inequality, and geopolitical conflicts. As popular culture explores the breakdown of society, films like Furiosa and novels like Waste Tide delve into the causes and consequences of a world torn apart by the struggle for scarce resources. This article examines how these works use Hobbesian concepts of enmity to critique the global neoliberal order and highlight the dangers of unchecked competition in the face of environmental collapse.

The Hobbesian State of Nature and Modern Resource Conflicts

The notion of the “state of nature,” as described by Thomas Hobbes, is foundational in understanding how apocalyptic fiction frames resource wars. Hobbes argued that in a world without strong social contracts, humans are driven by self-preservation and competition, resulting in a perpetual “war of every man against every man.” This concept is vividly depicted in contemporary stories, where the race to secure vital goods—oil, rare earth elements, water, and food—leads to violence and societal collapse. In both Furiosa and Waste Tide, resource wars are not just background details but core elements that drive the plot and character motivations.

Apocalyptic fiction has surged in popularity, mirroring global concerns over climate change, pandemics, and economic instability. These stories often portray societies on the brink, where resource wars become inevitable due to the failure of institutions and the dominance of neoliberal policies. Works like The Last of Us, 28 Years Later, and Dune envision futures where the struggle for resources leads to environmental devastation and the breakdown of community. Such narratives serve as cautionary tales, warning against the relentless pursuit of growth at the expense of social and ecological well-being.

Furiosa: Survival, Violence, and the Cycle of Exploitation

Furiosa, the latest chapter in the Mad Max saga, presents a world where civilization has collapsed under the weight of human enmity and relentless resource extraction. The film’s protagonist undergoes a transformation from innocent victim to hardened warrior, mirroring the Hobbesian belief that survival demands ruthless action. The various factions in the wasteland battle over control of oil, food, and territory, embodying the essence of resource wars. Even attempts at creating peaceful societies, like the Green Place, ultimately fall victim to the relentless cycle of exploitation and violence.

The film critiques the neoliberal ethos by showing how technological innovation and competition do not necessarily lead to prosperity for all. Instead, they perpetuate inequality and environmental degradation, leaving only temporary victors in an ongoing cycle of conflict. The world of Furiosa becomes a stark metaphor for current global struggles over natural resources, where military power and economic interests override considerations of justice and sustainability.

Waste Tide: Altruism Amidst Technological and Environmental Ruin

In contrast to the violent spectacle of Furiosa, Waste Tide offers a more introspective exploration of resource wars and their human cost. Set on Silicon Isle, a hub of e-waste processing, the novel follows characters caught in the crossfire between corrupt officials, criminal syndicates, and multinational corporations seeking to monopolize rare earth minerals. The environmental and psychological toll of the e-waste trade is depicted through vivid imagery and character transformation, underscoring the dehumanizing effects of unchecked exploitation.

Yet, Waste Tide ultimately advocates for altruism and collective action, suggesting that the cycle of conflict can be broken. The protagonist’s journey from victimhood to leadership symbolizes hope for a more just and sustainable future, where cooperation replaces competition. This vision stands in stark contrast to the Hobbesian “state of nature,” challenging the assumption that enmity and violence are inevitable outcomes of scarcity.

Conclusion: Lessons from Apocalyptic Resource Wars

The depiction of resource wars in apocalyptic fiction serves as both a reflection of present-day anxieties and a warning for the future. By drawing on Hobbesian philosophy, works like Furiosa and Waste Tide highlight the dangers of a world governed by competition and exploitation. However, they also offer alternative visions, emphasizing the potential for altruism, community, and systemic change. As resource conflicts continue to shape global politics, these stories encourage critical reflection on the values and institutions that underpin our society—and challenge us to imagine a new path forward.


This article is inspired by content from Original Source. It has been rephrased for originality. Images are credited to the original source.

Subscribe to our Newsletter